Chapter 12: No Man Can Serve Two Masters
Canada's Covid Tyrants: Book 2 - Occupation
Previous: Chapter 11: Police State and Covid Protests
Chapter 12: No Man Can Serve Two Masters
Alberta
Pastor Coates was released from jail and all charges were dropped but one. This gave hope of a possible relaxation of covid tyranny and unconstitutional laws. These minor setbacks or false spring for the nanny state acted as a prelude to their offensive. The busybody tyrant knows deep in their heart they are correct and like the tyrannical mother they will scold you and break every bone in your body with a smile. Oppressing you for your own good. Grace Life church was seized, and propaganda journalists were hysterically crying in their twitter bubbles that ‘NOT ENOUGH WAS BEING DONE! KENNY MUST DO MORE!’ Premier Kenney and Dr. Deena Hinshaw (chief medical officer of health for Alberta Health Services, AHS) cared more what far left twitter socialists, and their echo chamber had to say then hard-working Albertans.
The Whistlestop restaurant rebellion and the Christian churches of Alberta continued their resistance to overbearing and inhuman laws. While cases of Covid did rise the death rates were still minimal, with no deaths of under 20-years-old.1 Importantly, the population of Alberta is much smaller (4.5 million) than Ontario’s (14.8 million) population. These provinces both had similar patterns, high numbers of cases for elderly persons and few numbers of cases for younger individuals. With 82.1% of deaths in Alberta for elderly (70+) as opposed to Ontario’s 84% elderly death share. Regardless of the risks the protesters exerted their rights, and the Alberta government was not impressed.
Whistle Stop Rebellion
The Whistle stop rebellion continued despite the injunction granted to AHS by the courts to seize the building and gas station with the assistance of RCMP at 6:30 am (MT) on May 5th. That May 5th was also the second day of Pastor Coates’ trial.9 Chris Scott continued his fight and opened ‘Freedom Park’ the following day. He sold burgers, drinks, and other food.9 As one of a few gas stations for 15-20km in a rural area, the community was upset by these unaccountable tyrant carpetbaggers. The carpetbaggers attempted to close and force eviction of Scott’s campground. A protest was planned for the weekend (May 7-10) resulting in the arrest of Scott on May 9th and being held in custody at the Remand Centre.10
AHS and courts ignored the Chris Scott’s lawyer Chad Williamson in a secret court hearing on May 6th. The corrupt Rooke Order was enacted. This overly broad dictate appeared to restrain the rights of Chris Scott, Glen Carritt (United we Roll) and unnamed Jane and John Does from organizing and promoting “illegal public gatherings”.11 Essentially, the court outlawed any protests because of the pandemic! Was there proof of transmission or violence? No, of course not! The corrupt judges and AHS were willing to do anything to stop dissent. The Rooke order would eventually be narrowed by the legal action of the JCCF.27
Judge Rooke arbitrarily blocked protests and chilled speech for around 9 or so days. What accountability does this corrupt, nutjob judge receive?? His overly broad order was enacted without contacting either of the parties’ lawyers listed. Nor were the accused served the Rooke order prior to attempts to inflict contempt of court charges. Judge Rooke violated charter rights with no consequence. This from a judge that in 2012 Globe and Mail puff piece wanted to remove “legal parasites”.28 The law is shockingly alive when it comes to letting socially friendly criminals off. If you are a regular Canadian, the law applies full throatily. Judge Rooke bloviated about the lowly plebs spreading conspiracy theories. While his Rooke Order is stuffed with conspiracy theories and takes judicial notice of covid policies effectiveness. Yes, the order is a preliminary Order, but what of evidence?
The Order from Rookie Rooke signed off on banning public gatherings labeling them “illegal public gatherings”.29 Clearly, Associate Chief Justice Rooke failed charter laws and believes that freedom of assembly, association, conscious, mobility and expression are mere suggestions. Praise be to ScienceTM we had a Judge Rooke that deftly ignored charter rights because PANDEMIC! Judges like Rooke would sign an order to genocide or castrate Canadians without a second thought if it were “for the greater good”. “If the order comes from the government, we must be deferential to it!”
Pawlowski
Pastor Artur Pawlowski had become a thorn in the sides of Calgary and Alberta public health and politicians. Be it feeding the homeless in winter2 or generally refusing to bow down to their golden calf. AHS, bylaw, and the Regime began to target this loudmouth polish pastor. On Easter Weekend (April 3rd, 2021) health officials and police came to his church during service. He told them to leave. So much for right to worship. Artur, in a video that later went viral, escorted bylaw and police from his property, “Please get out. Get out of this property immediately. Get out of this property immediately. I don’t want to hear a word.” And when the busy body tyrants refused to leave and refuse to back down, “OUT! Out of this property until you come back with a warrant.” Requiring lots of encouragement to leave the property Artur continued, “OUT, I don’t care what you have to say. OUT of this property. Out! YOU NAZIS! OUT! Gestapo is not allowed here”. The Peace officers, health inspector and police officer were left stunned and dumbfounded. ‘Aren’t people just supposed to blindly obey stupid rules like themselves? On their way out he continued, “Nazi’s are not welcome here” and “don’t come back without a warrant.”3 4
Pastor Artur Pawlowski, who grew up in communist Poland, warned that rights taken are not easily returned by governments. The viral video brought international attention hurting the pride of Alberta public health (AHS). AHS, Premier Kenney, and the anti-Canadian media sought to hurt and harass Pastor Pawlowski. Rebel news, who had been with Pastor Pawlowski since his first few fines for feeding the homeless people of Calgary, helped crowd fund legal council. AHS embolden by a far-left hysterical echo chamber sought to make an example of Artur.
Pastor Coates felt the full brunt of the stupid machine. AHS flexed their new terrifying powers that no unelected bureaucrats should ever hold. A secret warrant was granted using secret evidence to arrest Pastor Pawlowski on April 28th, 2021, without notifying him, nor his council Sarah Miller of JSS.5 The covid gestapo came by a few more times to harass the church before finally arresting Pastor Pawlowski after he left a Saturday service on May 8th, 2021. Around 7:30pm (EST) a video from Ezra Levant (of Rebel News) that showed Pastor Pawlowski, his brother and a friend stopped by 4-5 police SUVs on busy roadway.6 Artur arrested and dragged off in the middle of traffic and thrown into the back of one of the SUVs.
To satisfy their sadistic desire to put Pastor Pawlowski in his place, corrupt Calgary police officers placed Artur in Calgary Remand Centre (Prison). Pastor Pawlowski’s lawyers attempted to track him and his brother down to provide legal council. Requests for Artur or his brother to speak to his legal council were repeatedly denied for both Artur and his lawyers by Calgary Police Services (CPS).7 He was put in solitary confinement for 24 hours upon arrival and guards attempted to force him to wear a mask. When bail was finally met on May 10th, the prison refused to release to Artur or his brother Dawid for several hours. Remand Centre claimed that Dawid’s polish name was incorrectly spelt. The corrupt centre also attempted to kick reporters off ‘private property’ who were waiting for the brothers’ release. OH, vindictive souls. Eventually both brothers were released, and a court date was heard on May 26th.
On May 16th Pastor Pawlowski released a video showing fire crews tending to a fire at his personal garage across from his home.8 The fire was started suspiciously close to the time of his arrest and was later ruled an arson.
Judge A.W. Germain was assigned to the case of both Chris Scott, Artur, and Dawid Pawlowski for May 26th, 2021. Germain in his decision lied repeatedly,30
“In Charter litigation, it is the individual who raises the Charter breach that must prove it on a balance of probabilities. Here, the video evidence discloses that at the time of their arrest, both Respondents were vociferously objecting and resisting arrest and were very volatile, angry, and unreasonable. “
shifting the onus to the defendants to prove their innocence of supposed “resisting arrest”. At no point during the video did Artur resist arrest. If you refuse to assist the police during your arrest, Gestapo Germain believes that to be RESISTING! Gestapo Germain and Calgary Gestapo were furious that the video went international with attention from American media such as Fox News and US senators.
The problem with doddering old fools is that the law is often not what they claim it to be. However, deference is paid to their garbage rulings because someone forgot to sign them up for an old age home. By Germain’s reading if Police are arresting you, you must handcuff yourself, walk yourself into their car to not be resisting! Of course, no charge of resisting arrest was brought because it is just layered on top to allow soft minded idiots to excuse bad police and judicial behaviour. Germain showed that his soft mind was addled by the PANDEMIC writing,
“Their affidavits indicate that they were not allowed to call a lawyer, were denied basic necessities and were treated badly. Even assuming all of that to be true (although I recognize that the CPS have not had a chance to respond to those specific allegations), it would still not amount to a Charter remedy as high as a stay of proceedings. First AHS, the Applicant, is not the CPS, nor the Department of Justice. They are an independent health entity fighting to save lives during a global pandemic. To fasten them with allegations of wrongdoing on the part of CPS would be inappropriate.”
Germain admits that the allegations amounted to a charter challenge, just not enough to stay the proceedings. Set the bar too high so he can deny; hand wash that Charter violations away. Next Germain then muddles the case pretending that there is no overlap of government actors between AHS, CPS and Department of Justice. Excusing the behaviour of CPS and Department of Justice because AHS is “independent” health agency in middle of global pandemic! This is particularly sinister. Germain divides bodies of government apart to excuses wrongdoings of the justice system (CPS), acting on behalf of the AHS, as being separate! We are to believe the left hand does not know what the right hand is doing.
This decision should go down as one of the worst decisions ever written and the fool that wrote it should be dishonourably removed from law. Germain goes on to argue that charter violations here are immaterial because normally they only cause exclusion of evidence or sanction.
“While the Court would always recommend that people taken into custody be given immediate access to a lawyer, to elevate that potential breach, in a civil context, to a stay of the contempt proceeding would be an overzealous application of s 24 of the Charter. If I borrow from criminal law, Charter breaches which occur after the infraction most often (if they result in any remedy) either exclude evidence or mitigate the sentence (sanction); they rarely result in a procedural stay.”
Good to know that our superiors in the courts and justice system think charter violations are minor events that need no recourse. This decision was written by Gestapo Germain crystalizes the worst habits of the Canadian justice system. Reverse onus of the Charter. Complete deference to government actors. Post hoc rationalization of right infringements to cover for bias. These types of decisions would never occur for a far-left terrorist like Omar Khadr or antifa pedophilic sex gangs. A slap on their limp wrist and a permission slip to violence. ‘Come on guys! Don’t you know Charter rights only apply to child rapists and murderers!’
In sentencing Gestapo Germain demanded compelled speech from Artur and his brother when ever speaking in public,31
“I am also aware that the views I am expressing to you on this occasion may not be views held by the majority of medical experts in Alberta. While I may disagree with them, I am obliged to inform you that the majority of medical experts favour social distancing, mask wearing, and avoiding large crowds to reduce the spread of COVID-19. Most medical experts also support participation in a vaccination program unless for a valid religious or medical reason you cannot be vaccinated. Vaccinations have been shown statistically to save lives and to reduce the severity of COVID-19 symptoms.”
Wonderful! This old liberal MLA turned corrupt judge now gets to decide what your speech is; we will just throw that freedom of speech (expression) in the trash. Hilariously, that whole medical and valid religious exemptions are both lies. Firstly, religious exemptions should be none of the governments business. Any person’s religious exemption should be based solely on their belief WITHOUT interrogation from anyone else. To do otherwise would put the state in the business of regulating religion. On top of violating conscious and religious rights, the State has no business in regulating religious beliefs. So much for separation of church and state.
This discussion was short circuited as Trudeau and Premiers pressured medical licensers and religious organizations to accept the holy Vaccine or suffer the consequences. But that story waits for us at the end of 2021. Liberalism is the Universal Acid ideology of pretending to hold standards (free speech, separation of church and state) to lull your enemy into a false security before you kill them. When the cards are down “Liberals” believe in the exercise of power through covert/subversive methods when weak, naked violence when strong.
The Pawlowskis were also heavily fined, given travel restrictions. It took until November 25, 2021, for these unconstitutional and anti-charter orders to be successfully appealed. It took one to two months to revoke rights but around 8 months to correct. This partial remedy by Judge Jo'Anne Strekaf was the bare minimum. Eventually, the fine was reduced from $30,000 to $10,000 and 10 months of probation for both Pawlowskis and Chris Scott. The court acting like a stupid bumbling ogre that cannot admit its own wrongdoing proved that charter violations have no meaningful consequences. The court judges, Jo'Anne Strekaf, Barbara Lea Veldhuis, and Michelle Crighton were very pissy that Artur, Dawid and Chris Scott did not respect their authority nor the authority of the court.
“We have concluded that a term of incarceration is appropriate to reflect the seriousness of Mr. Scott’s breach of an injunction obtained to protect the public health. The three days which Mr. Scott spent in custody following his arrest, when coupled with the other sanctions, was sufficient for that purpose, particularly as his conduct following his release reflected no further breaches of the injunction. In addition, Mr. Scott should be subject to a fine, which we have set at $10,000, after taking into account the serious nature of his breach of the injunction, the other sanctions imposed on him and the circumstances surrounding and nature of the mobility and qualified speech provisions to which he was subject for approximately six weeks prior to the granting of a stay pending appeal.”
The mediocre threesome appeared more concerned with protecting the court from criticism then actually analysing the validity of the injunction that was built on sand. These courts enforce laws that violate charter rights and will come after you vindictively if you show them contempt WHILE they enforce illegal laws. The judges hung their hat on “lone judge” narrative claiming that AHS did not ask for compelled speech nor travel restrictions. It is just too bad they did not tell anyone until June 2022 a year after their implementation and subsequent removal. These judges’ hand-waved the role that AHS played and ignored that AHS DID argue for mobility right restrictions during the appeal.
This is the problem with having government agencies with zero accountability. Justice system gives deference to the health agency, and both have an incestuous relationship where it does not need to be in writing what the one wants the other to do. ‘The Judge messed up? I know we’ll get a JUDGE to figure out if they messed up and what to do! Shockingly, the judges always weasel out of accountability.’ We are stuck with incompetent judges that believe rights are a glass trophy sitting on the mantle to brag about in good times to company; but when that earthquake hits hide those RIGHTS quick! ‘If we don’t hide them, they may break!’.
Our rights are MORE important during a crisis. We cannot have fair-weather rights that evaporate at the first sign of trouble. “Just following orders” should not be an excuse for committing genocide nor violating charter rights. “Just follow the orders” should therefore also not be an excuse for contempt of court charges. If you can punishment Artur or Dawid or Chris or James Topp, anyone else for not following unconstitutional/charter infringement laws with contempt of court the rights are negated by proxy. Laws must be LAWFULLY designed. The unconstitutional law, the anti-charter law is at the root poisoned and must be torn up. Any infringement that follows from an unjust law should be nullified.
After the arrest of these freedom fighters, the obese socialist Calgary Mayor Naheed Nenshi lashed out at the lockdown protesters. Talking to Global News’ Abigail Bimman, Nenshi proclaimed that he did not wish to make this political. Going on to make it political he said, “Those people at those anti-mask protests, let’s not kid ourselves. They’re not people who need to eat. They are people who are marching in thinly veiled white nationalist supremacist anti-government protests.”12 13 14 Bimman did not push back on these vile and hateful comments from the Calgary Mayor. Do not, what ever you do, get in the way of Nenshi and his food.
‘Everyone I don’t like is a Nazi/white supremacist a favourite screed of the progressive hate mob.’ More alarming, however, is the modification to the global news article that has the 7-minute video. Below a screenshot of their third paragraph with the same quote but square brackets modifying the quote and it’s meaning. There is no reason for this other than an after the fact apology/retraction of the statement which did not occur. Nenshi should be out of a job for his mismanagement and hateful comments, and by all current laws on hate speech he should be locked up. Global news needs to pick between being journalists or advocates.
Tim Stephens
Not even a week later (May 16th) Calgary police arrested Tim Stephens, pastor of Fairview Baptist Church in Calgary under the Rooke Order as Chris Scott of Whistle Stop Café, Glen Carritt of United We Roll, Jane and John Does.15 16 He peacefully went with police and remained in jail for one day. Lawyers from the JCCF, however, were outraged as they successfully fought to narrow the scope of the order to only apply to those specific groups rather than anyone protesting the lockdown (or any Albertan).17 The broad powers with no cross examination were alarming to any constitutionally minded Canadian.
Stephens’ parish went underground while he was fighting for his constitutional right to exercise of religion, conscious, assembly and mobility. With his court date set for June. However, on May 26th after reviewing the case the prosecutor dropped the contempt of court case. Citing the fact, the police did not properly serve Tim Stephens prior to his arrest and the narrowing of the JCCF it was clear the case was a failure.18 Global news and other propagandists spun the arrest as a case of ‘mistaken identity’ and do their damnedest to cover for terrible police work and overreach of the AHS, police and prosecutor.19 Tim Stephens eventually had his case dropped on May 28th.20 21 AHS, however, made it clear the following Sunday they were not done with him and continued to harass him and his congregation.22
On June 14th, while Trudeau was enjoying a nice elitist barbeque, Calgary ‘Police Officers’ came to Pastor Stephens’ house to arrest him on the ‘defunct’ order for John Does. Stephens questioned the legality of it to officers that cited, “just doing my job”. When asked why they did not arrest Jason Kenney (premier of Alberta) for his Sky Palace breach or other politicians or himself (as the officer admitted to breaking the law) since the broad Rooke Order applied to them. The police officers stated they could only speak to this arrest and said, “nobodies perfect.” When Mrs. Stephens responded, “Jesus is perfect” the officer attempted to put on his Christian mask to quote scripture to them saying “well even Jesus said, ‘render unto Caesar, what is Caesar’s’”. Mr. Stephens correctly responded, “a gathering of a church is not Caesar’s”.23 24 When he says render unto Caesar, Jesus is saying give unto the state everything of yourself that belongs or is due to the state. Jesus was denouncing materialism and the next line of “to God the things that are God’s” is a call to Christian to sacrifice body and soul to God’s will. To the fascist, to the materialist authoritarians, the communist the body, there is no soul. To these materialistic ideologies/religions, everything of you belongs entirely to the state to be used and sacrificed as seen fit. This is the ideology of this police officer. Mr. Stephens refused to accept bail conditions and remained in prison for a crime that caries no jail time.25
On June 26th, a protest formed outside of the Remand Centre in Calgary demanding for the release of Pastor Tim Stephen who continued to sit while Kenney continued to do all he could to distract from his persecution of Christians.26 Josh Hawley (Missouri Senator) released a letter urging the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedoms consider adding Canada to ‘watch list’,26
“I am troubled that our Canadian neighbors are effectively being forced to gather in secret, undisclosed locations to exercise their basic freedom to worship. Frankly, I would expect this sort of religious crackdown in Communist China, not in a prominent Western nation like Canada. Canadian authorities’ arrest of faith leaders and seizure of church property, among other enforcement actions, appear to constitute systematic, ongoing, and egregious violations of religious freedom.”32
The Stephen’s family had to wait to July 1st (Canada day) for Tim to be released after 2 weeks in prison with a court date set for July 12.33 The slow crawl to justice began and Pastor Stephens did not find relief for holding outdoor services until November 2022.34 It was only after after a change in provincial government when the government stopped harassing him. He obtain some relief and then full relief with all charges dropped on August 1st 2023.35
In the shocking decision released by Honourable Judge A.A. Fradsham,
“ With respect, that question is not legally relevant to the issues before me. Pastor Stephens is charged with contravening section 2(1) of CMOH Order 26-2020. I see nothing in the provisions of that particular order of the Chief Medical Officer of Health which imposed any legal obligation on Pastor Stephens to ensure, compel, or encourage compliance, by those attending the religious services he was conducting, with paragraph 2(1) of CMOH Order 26-2020.
There was no evidence in respect of either of the dates as to the distance between Pastor Stephens and other people. None of the photographic evidence allows one to draw any reliable inference as to the distance, on either date, between Pastor Stephens and other people.
During submissions, when this issue was raised with Counsel, the Crown noted that Pastor Stephens did not claim to be 2 metres or more distant from other people. With respect, the onus is on the Crown to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Pastor Stephens did not factually comply with the distancing requirements of paragraph 2(1) of the Order; there is no onus on Pastor Stephens to prove that he was in factual compliance with the Order. Only if the Crown proves beyond a reasonable doubt that Pastor Stephens was in actual non-compliance with the Order does a burden then shift to Pastor Stephens to prove on a balance of probabilities that he exercised due diligence in his efforts to comply.
The Crown has failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt an essential element of the two alleged offences being tried before me.” (Italics added by author for emphasis)
AHS and the Crown prosecutor showed themselves to be contemptable and were smacked down by the judge asking why 2 metres were relevant. For too long, corrupt judges just allowed and paid all possible deference to Crown fools. The Crown expected a conviction with no evidence. They expected an accusation of wrong-doing to be taken on faith. The courts in the honest ruling showed that most Crown prosecutors and judges are happy to have guilty until proven innocent show trials. This ruling was about the sadly, the best to hope for from current judges. It accepts the legality of Rookie Rooke’s order. This is one of the issues with “winning” it pushes the dialectic towards opponent goal by playing on corrupted field.
Ontario
Protests in November for Ontario had found their way to Doug Ford’s house and Mayor Tory’s apartment. Loud noises were made during all parts of the day. The “out of work casualties” of the ruling elite’s covid plan were protesting! Some pigs blood was thrown on Ford’s house.1 New year. New lockdowns with ever changing rules and arbitrary restrictions. More Canadians moved from afraid to angry. Protests volume to increased in size and scope. Generally, protests were ignored in the first waves. Protesters were quickly becoming a thorn in the side of covid authoritarians. The longer the lockdowns progressed the more sensible the “conspiracy theorists” sounded. Maybe there was something to these conspiracy theories! Protesters decried the ineffective and arbitrary covid policies that ruined many of their lives. Toronto Mayor Tory sent police thugs to clear Yonge-Dundas square. The public square in Toronto that is an imitation of NYC Time’s Square is often used as a protest or celebration space.2
Ford had effectively banned protests in Queen’s Park with ‘standing’ fines for those not ‘socially distancing’ or ‘gathering in a group of more than X people’. These fines were also used to harass reporters as reported by Rebel News. Yet, BLM and other left-wing protesters were free to ignore covid policies and occupied Nathan Philips square (Toronto City Hall). Left wing protesters are treated with kid gloves even in the face of harassment, assault, and other crimes. Left wing causes, when peaceful, should be free to exercise their rights to protest just as right wing or other political persuasions. A consistent standard arose as police and bylaw officers hounded, harassed, and bullied anti-lockdown protesters.3 But, as left wing blogTO covered a large protest could go ahead for “anti-Asian racism”4 with known organizers and no bylaw officer enforcement.
Courts and politicians that claim to be for the poor and dispossessed are so very quick to issue an entry fee for protesting. Inalienable rights granted from God were now subject to social-economic situation. Quite odd that policies supported by left wing Tory and Ford (they are not conservatives in policy, culture, or governance, Ford is at best centre left and Tory is far left both. Have centrist positions on economy that passes as ‘right wing’ in Canada) sought to only allow those of privileged position to exercise their rights. To protest one must be able to pay a $880 ticket or hire a lawyer to fight the fine. This allowed for the exclusion of persons that have a tight budget from making their voices heard in a democratic system. Ah, Canada! Where your right to assemble and petition the government is subject to a $1000 poll tax.
This protest tax was, however, not equally applied. The same police that knelt for BLM and raised their fist in the Marxist salute preferred far left-wing protests (even terrorist groups) but refuse to grant these rights to Canadians to protest covid policies. ‘I know you lost your job because of covid but can’t you just understand we would prefer you die? #Were all in this together!’ Walk-in clinics were essentially closed to the public in early 2021. Beaches, parks, and outdoor activities were all not allowed. You are only allowed to work, binge video games or movies or TV, eat, and protest the right causes.
By the end of January, despite the cold protesters attempted protests at Nathan Philips square where they were met by a heavy police presence. The police blocked off the square and gave tickets and harassed protesters for ‘refusing to identify’. When you did identify yourself, police issued a ticket, if you do not identify the officers get to assault you under the draconian lockdown laws and then issue a ticket. ‘I’m stomping your face into the cement for your safety!’ Rebel News (David Menzies, Efron Monsanto, Lincoln Jay, and Mocha Berzigan) were present to cover the protest. Police decided to harass the Rebel News Reporters while they attempted to film police arresting a woman holding an anti-lockdown sign. Toronto Police had special relish for harassing persons with signs or Canadian flags.
The fireworks started to really kick off when a man, chased by 3 police into the street for refusing to give up his Canadian flag, was tackled to the ground. Like any good reporter Monsanto, Berzigan and Jay ran out to record this police interaction. Captured on video is a police officer in yellow vest shoving Monsanto and attempting to using his leg to trip him as he pushed him (removing his shoe in the process). Another person in the crowd spat on the police and was arrested while the police took a hostile approach again to shove the reporters around. Orders from the top for a show of force.
The grunts on the ground were, of course, “just following orders”. The police harassed Canadians for walking near the protest that were wearing button that read, “I’m exempt” (from the mask).5 With the police responding, “you can only be outside for essential” and “protesting is not essential” or “we are going after groups of more than 5”. Oddly enough standing near 5 other persons was considered “a group of more than 5 people”. Who needs association rights and assemble or protest rights?
Incensed Rebel News sued Toronto Police for their heavy-handed approach causing police to walk back this jackboot approach. Protesters also adapted to have ‘no leaders’ and no fixed location to counter these kindly inquisitors. The worst aspect of the police is the schoolmarming. With smug, self righteous bewilderment that Canadians, land of the Strong and Free, could have a problem with draconian laws that made little sense if one stopped goose-stepping for more than half a moment to think. The police in Toronto continued to harass and ticket Canadians but there was much less brutish arrogance.
Different regions had similar rules but widely different enforcement. Peterborough (northeast of the Greater Toronto Area (GTA) by about 2 hours) was the site of a large anti-lockdown protest. Maxine Bernier and Randy Hillier were both present and at the end of the event the cowardly police chief ticketed both for the “illegal gathering”.7 This same chief was photographed bending the knee and encouraging BLM protests. As an agent of the state police have a vital role to remain neutral in their compacity as law enforcement officers. By wearing their uniform and engaging in politically charged protests they dishonoured their duty and badge. Covid was just a smart virus it knew when someone was protesting for a worthy cause versus an unworthy cause! This method of selective enforcement should be illegal as discriminatory.
Hamilton, west of the GTA, had protests throughout the lockdown at their city hall often attended by a small crowd. Police and bylaw harassed and issued $880 fines or court summon tickets to the protesters. Rebel reporter Efron Monsanto was ticketed several times for recording and interviewing the protesters. This was, however, a step up from the heavy-handed arresting of some protesters that had occurred in the previous weeks.8
Pastor Hildebrandt from Aylmer Ontario and the Church of God ruffled the feathers of Ontario public health and Ford with continued church services in their parking lot (either live or via radio). The government, by May 31, 2021, issued over $266,000 in fines to the church for continually flaunting the rules. This culminated with seizing the church and demanding that the church pay the fines immediately.9 The church refused and continued to meet outside as both local police, Ontario public health, Ford and propaganda media grinded their teeth at religiously observant Christians. The Church’s sign was smashed along with other threats. It is too bad the police could not waste resources to find the property damagers while surveying the Church. Surely, no hysterical covid fool or police officer would take out their rage on the sign.
On June 6th, 2021, a 20-year-old male used his truck to kill 5 members of a Muslim family. After the attack Canadians were once again called to self flagellate for the sins of “whiteness”. Covid, recognizing the severity of the situation, respected the slain victims and its benevolence allowed for the public funeral to occur with hundreds in attendance. Premier Ford received this guarantee directly from Covid himself! And temporarily removed covid restrictions.10 To complete the media circus, Trudeau, Ford, and every other slim ball politician in Ontario rushed to the funeral. For over two years Canadians were refused the right to grieve their loved ones properly and publicly. This family (and community) should be allowed to grieve and have a funeral.11 Canadians right were tied to the petty whims of an obese fool obsessed with PR? We all know of loved ones lost during the pandemic years who were unceremoniously put in the ground. At least the political parasites got a nice Photo Op.
In May of 2021, news quietly leaked about a pattern of patients at Long Term Care homes (LTC) neglected at high rates in 2020 (the first wave).13 “All they needed was water and a wipe down.” According to the Globe and Mail’s Karen Howlett the Canadian military reports of Ontario ‘nursing homes’ (LTC) deaths from covid were from neglect and dehydration. At Downsview LTC centre 26 died from dehydration before military team arrived “to provide humanitarian and medical support”. These reports were backed up earlier by signals of problems at the LTC in 2020. While most officials pointed to bad policy coordination. The key of the problem was the neglect of healthcare and service. This was obfuscated and covered up.14
Many of the policies were bad. Negative tests were required to go back and caused staff shortages. Many nurses worked in several locations allowing for more easy transmission. Nurses were already short-staffed due to long history of union gatekeeping and government mismanagement. These valid concerns were compounded by the unspoken problem. Hysteria. Are we expected to believe that nurses in no way were affected by the fear porn hysteria that told them that this was the most dangerous disease ever? Are we to believe that the neglect was ONLY caused by short staffing?
After a full year of crazy policies and enforcement a group of 19 Ontario Police Officers launched a Charter challenge on the pandemic restrictions.15 The officers and their lawyer Rocco Galati challenged the legality of the polices and enforcement stating that the enforcement was putting officers at odds with their oath and duty to uphold charter (constitution). The officers (Sgt. Evans of Toronto and Sgt. Vandenbos of York) in their press conference spoke to a divide among the rank-and-file officers to mindless enforcement of these arbitrary and ever-changing rules. “Anyone who dares speak out is ostracized and attacked, even if they do so in civil and appropriate ways,” according to their lawyer speaking to the heavily politicized police chiefs. The Attorney general of Ontario claimed there was no merit in this case.
CBC article listing declaration of the lawsuit.
Nova Scotia No! Hamas Vs Israel? YES!
On May 14th, 2021, it was announced that Nova Scotia’s premier Iain Rankin who, fresh off a leadership election (as the previous Premier resigned), dropped the hammer on the small, dedicated group of anti-covid policy protesters. The Premier sought a court injunction against the protesters. So much for the right to assemble, mobility and petitioning of the government. The corrupt Supreme Court of Nova Scotia Justice Scott Norton found his way out from hiding under his desk to grant the injunction giving all possible deference to the Premier to infringe on constitutional rights.
Norton snivelled and whined that the “anticipated harm” was imminent due to “potential spread” of Covid-19.1 Merely potential spread is considered harm rising to the level of violation of Charter rights. Not even SPREAD but potential spread. Potential harm from potential spread. By this standard walking out the door could be illegal—oh wait. Did Norton consult doctors or scientists? Was there any risk assessment conducted for the risk of potential spread of covid at any protest?
Just like Alberta 13 months was not enough time to obtain information to justify covid policy actions in the face of the Charter. Neither Norton, nor Rankin could have predicted the rockets fired from Hamas at Israel. The inflamed tensions between Israel and Palestine sparked both Israeli and Hamas supporter protests. These protests, not being relevant to Canada, went forward with no issue, despite some violence. Propagandists played defense for the protesters. Question the ticketing of a Palestinian protest of 500 people.2 How can you expect them NOT to protest! What’s that you’re Canadian and think you have rights!? HA! We only allow foreign issues that are no threat to the Regime! Not once was increased risk of spread for the 50-ish person anti-lockdowns protest demonstrated or even attempted to be demonstrated. Deference to the courts/police and selective prosecution of the politically lowest caste system members.
While Nova Scotia held their idiotic position no matter who protested. The more political Toronto and Montreal police did not ticket Israeli,3 nor Palestinian protestors despite of the violence. In Montreal glass was broken at the Israeli embassy4 and some protesters climbed the scaffold. A Toronto man with an Israel flag was beaten by a group of Palestinian protesters.5 A Rebel reporter was punched in the face by an Israeli protester.6
All Canadians should be free to protest peacefully for their cause. The key word being peacefully. Politicians should not get to pick and choose who can protest. Nor should the sins of an individual idiot be laid at the feet of the whole. If one stupid person punches someone that person should be dealt with. Not shut down of the entire event. Although, Hamas (the target of Palestinian support) is a marked terrorist organization. It is troubling that this foreign conflict seems to be more respected by police and politicians than our own local issues. ‘Sure, you can protest about tyranny around the world, but you don’t dare talk about Canada’s flawless leaders!’
Trudeau, the thought leader of Canadian progressive Liberals, tweeted out their support for Canadian’s right to protest on the Israel and Palestine conflict saying “Everyone has the right to assemble peacefully and express themselves freely in Canada”.7 To be fair to Trudeau the public square in Ottawa at parliament had been one of the freest areas to protest at during early covid. One must ignore the funding of every activist group in Canada to foment division by the federal Trudeau Regime. This did not stop Trudeau’s growing contempt for Canadians protesting the lockdowns repeating the Covid lie that those protesting had caused spread.8
No, covid was an opportunity for Trudeau and his minority party. It was time to push gun grabbing, more immigrants, censorship and neo-racist (critical race theory) policies to fundamentally change Canadian society. Why did Trudeau censor covid protests? Better to cause suffering and impetuously play the savior for a man-child washout with a messiah complex.
Manitoba
Suffering under the inept and blundering leadership of Premier Brian Pallister. Manitoba suffered some of the harshest and stupidest covid restrictions in all of Canada. Pastor Tobias Tissen, the Church of God in Steinbach, organized initiatives to feed the homeless and protest the lockdown. Pallister refused challenges to his authority. He crushed citizens and their rights in a fear induced power grab in his futile fight against the virus. The hubris of leaders to go 180o away from all conventional methods of dealing with a contagious disease was on full display in Pallister.
However, to question the NARRATIVE is to question the SCIENCETM or Dr. Fauci. The only response to questions about the severity of lockdowns, about the arbitrary rules, or mandatory vaccines (for vaccines with no liability), or the shifting goal posts, or the destruction of rights and liberties, was to call opponents “anti-vax” or science deniers. The ad-hominins and crazy claims were tossed in to poison the well while claiming “they’re putting us all at risk!”.
Pallister and other weak, pathetic weasel conservatives bent to corporate media pressure to destroy small businesses. Pallister tried to “even the playing field” by sectioning off “non-essential items” (a desperate idea Doug Ford attempted later).1 Strangely, covid cases in Manitoba continued to rise just like every other province. If you ask their public health, ‘it worked! And it does not matter. If they have no evidence at present, well that is because it is working. If you ask in the future, while they vote to seal the records (or hide behind privilege), that is because it worked!’ That is just SCIENCETM. One might also ask what non-essential or essential means as each person deems different things essential. Every person has unique needs. Value is based on the eye of the beholder. Insulin is not essential to the vast majority of the population, yet to those select few with diabetes it is the difference between life and death. Certain clothing articles were deemed non-essential in Manitoba. In the UK feminine hygiene products were deemed non-essential.3 “Comrade, the commissar will decide what you get, and you will like it.”
Pennsylvania’s Judge Stickman (William S. Stickman IV) issued a damning ruling in September 2020, against Governor Wolf’s ‘Stay at Home’ order. Governors and political/scientific ‘leaders’ were scrambling to lockdown the hardest. In a futile scramble for mask mandates and closing “non-essential” sales/services. Judge Stickman (also known as Judge Basedman) found that zero consideration went into essential vs. non-essential distinctions of goods and services.4
Instead of trusting citizens to react appropriately. Instead of remaining calm or balancing rights and the communal needs during a pandemic. Governments around the world opted to seize more and more control over citizens. And too often people let them take it.
Step 1: Policy disproportionally affects small business. Effect on covid? Unknown, but trust us!
Step 2: New policy to harm big business to “even the playing field.” Covid? What’s that?
Step 3: Amazon continues to make a killing on delivery. The idiocracy rules the day.
Premier Pallister attacked Christian churches for feeding of the homeless because they refused to worship his idols. Pastor Tobias was eventually forced into hiding for the crime of holding church service in person. How dare he assemble and exercise his religion while associating with others. Not to mention all parties were willing to risk covid. Pastor Tobias sought to call the Premier’s and health services bluff. Forcing them to arrest him while he was preaching service. Making it political suicide, considering the backlash Premier Kenney faced in Alberta over locking up Pastors. Pallister and his thugs decided to not arrest Pastor Tobias during service during the summer of 2021.
During the fall winter 2021, as vigilance decreased Pastor Tobias was arrested in October 2021. In a shockingly quick turn about the disgraced Queen’s bench of Manitoba Chief Judge Glen Joyal admitted section 2 (a, religion; b, belief; and c, assembly) charter rights infringements. Judge Joyal denied charter 7 infringement. This cowardly Regime judge hand-washed that these restrictions were justified because “global pandemic”:10
“Insofar as Manitoba has conceded and I have found that the alleged limitations of ss. 2(a), 2(b), and 2(c) under the Charter, I have also determined that the impugned restrictions in the PHOs are constitutionally justifiable as reasonable limits under s. 1 of the Charter.”
Where does this “constitutionally justifiable as reasonable limits” come from? The limit set is not the actual “demonstrably justified” standard but a lower limit. It is odd that judges are the one job where being wrong gets you a pay raise.
“In a case like the present, where individual rights compete with the public good and societal interests that are themselves protected by the Charter (because the health and lives of others are at stake), it is more likely that a restriction on rights may be found proportionate to its objective (see Carter, at paragraphs 94-96). The case law has confirmed that the proportionality requirement does not require perfection, but rather, that the limits on the rights in question be reasonable (see R. v. K.R.J., at paragraph 67).”
Except the plain reading of the charter section 1 says “reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society.” (un-line added by author)11 Dress a pig how ever you want, it is still a pig. Reasonable limits must be demonstrably justified. Demonstrably justified is just ignored because of the ‘Oakes Test’ attempt to reverse the onus onto the citizen from the government.
Judges like Joyal are looking for excuses to pardon the government. This is the issue with the Charter. It is no longer (if it ever was) a document that defends Canadians. It is a document that justifies government over-reach. By the logic in these cases ANY government action no matter how in error or harmful could be excused. So long as the decision was rationalized as not the most EXTREME step taken and if there was some method to the madness.
Towards some “greater good” that the judge agrees with. Judges would be hard pressed to condemn Public Health Officials in an emergency of killing infected individuals. So long as it was “minimally impactful” (it wasn’t all of them) and it was “for the greater good”. One needs only look at the charter website on CanLII to find that section 1, the get out of jail free card is cited 9.6 thousand times at the time and 4th most cited behind section 7 (Life, liberty, and security of person), Section 24, (enforcement), and Section 11 (Proceedings in criminal and penal matters). Whereas these sections contend with defenses of citizens section 1.
Paul A Bender of Manitoba Law Journal mused in 1983 about what exactly the scrutiny “demonstrably justified” has come to mean in the maturity of the Charter. Canadians often believe, and behave, as if there is a high bar of evidence and scrutiny that is required to remove rights. We have our answer for Mr. Bender, the judges laugh. Judges cite rights for criminals and other socially friendly elements to get them out of jail. If you are, however, a socially disfavoured element the Charter standard is lower than rational basis.
Joyal and other judges are all to happy to become executioners for the evil empire:
“Manitoba reminds the Court in this case that public health officials have been required to respond to a novel and complex pandemic. They have been required to make decisions quickly and in real time, in rapidly changing circumstances and in a climate of scientific uncertainty and evolving knowledge. Given that reality, while courts cannot abdicate their responsibility as protectors of the Constitution, neither should they forgot that the factual underpinnings for managing a pandemic are essentially scientific and involve medical matters that fall outside the institutional expertise of courts. When determining whether any related restriction on rights is constitutionally defensible, the courts should be wary of second guessing those who are managing a pandemic on the basis of their democratic responsibility or their properly delegated authority, particularly when there may be divergent opinions or schools of scientific thought (see Beaudoin, at paragraphs 120-21; Lapointe v. Hôpital Le Gardeur, 1992 CanLII 119 (SCC), [1992] 1 S.C.R. 351, at paragraph 31; Taylor v. Newfoundland and Labrador, at paragraphs 457-58; Trest v. British Columbia (Minister of Health), 2020 BCSC 1524, at paragraph 91).”
This paragraph describes how the judge is essentially going to take judicial notice of the effectiveness or ATTEMPT at effective policies. If you wonder why we have incompetency crisis with midwits that need to be seen doing something, it is because that is what the judges and politicians set as their standard. This morally bankrupt and vacuous thinking requires the judge to just trust that public health officials meant well! “Did they mess up? Oh, sorry! Well better luck next time! You’re irrevocably harmed? We’ll it was a pandemic after all!”
“In cases like the present, public decision makers are often called upon to balance the salutary effects of the public health measures against potential negative effects the severity of which, Manitoba has emphasized may be extremely difficult to predict or quantify. Manitoba is well to cite as they do, McLachlin J. (as she then was) in RJR-MacDonald Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General), 1995 CanLII 64 (SCC), [1995] 3 S.C.R. 199, where she held that the civil standard of proof under s. 1 does not require “scientific demonstration” or the “standard required by science” (at paragraph 137).”(italics and bold added by author.
During the arguments Pastor Tissen’s lawyer presented the Great Barrington Declaration and the judge accepted that:
"The position advanced relies upon the premise that it is necessary to build herd immunity in a population by allowing people at low risk of death to live their lives normally while protecting those who are at a higher risk. This approach is called “focused protection” and as Dr. Bhattacharya and the applicants have emphasized, it is an approach which has been endorsed by more than 50,000 scientists, physicians, and other medical professionals worldwide. It is the position of the applicants that the “focused protection” approach would have been significantly less intrusive and equally effective. It is an approach which as explained, would have involved the frequent testing of staff and visitors at long-term care homes, minimizing staff rotation, promoting grocery delivery to elderly people at home and having them meet family members outside. For those not vulnerable, it would involve promoting handwashing and staying home while sick and otherwise encouraging citizens to continue living their lives.”
The judge, however, framed the case, “The applicants have not contested the pressing and substantial nature of the objectives of the impugned PHOs. The concession is wise as the objectives are clearly meant to protect public health and more specifically, they are meant to save lives, prevent serious illness, and stop the exponential growth of the virus from overwhelming Manitoba’s hospitals and acute healthcare system.”
One can understand now why many believe that the Hitlerian invention of public health agencies need to be removed. Give an inch on, “sure, let’s promote public health”, and judges and public health officials believe that is a license to kill people for their health! We would never euthanize children (“MAiD”) or sterilize them (Gender surgeries or hormones). Right?
The judge then goes on a rant about COVID, COVID, COVID cases: “In acknowledging the pressing and substantial objectives of the impugned PHOs, it is well to note the backdrop to those orders that were first implemented in the fall of 2020 when the community transmission of COVID‑19 was raging. As was noted in the evidence, cases were doubling every two weeks and deaths were rising fast. Not surprisingly, Manitoba’s ICU and hospital capacity was being stretched to the maximum by those suffering from COVID‑19. There was indeed an urgent need to immediately address the COVID‑19 infections and flatten the curve as Manitoba’s hospitals and ICUs were in significant jeopardy of being overrun.”
Neglecting the distinction that was NOT made at the beginning of the pandemic of ‘with’ or ‘because’ of covid. In the early pandemic all admitted patients were tested for covid regardless of reason for admittance to hospital. “Car crash? Covid positive!” Further, there are many doubts that testing methods were accurate as rapid tests have been shown to test positive with tap water.12 Further on January 8th, 2024, a letter was posted on twitter from Interior Health (BC), stating that rapid antigen tests (RAT) were no longer to be used as they were “not reliable for diagnosis of covid-19.13
To prove the point that there is at best a low threshold and at worst no threshold standard, for the corruption that is the Oakes test, this judge states:
“In order to demonstrate a rational connection, a government must show a causal connection between the infringement and the benefit sought on the basis of reason or logic. A government need only show that it is reasonable to suppose that the measure in question may further the objective(s), not that it will absolutely do so. It is not a high threshold. There must however be a rational link between the infringing measure and its goal or object (see Hutterian Brethren, at paragraphs 48, 51).”
So long as there is a “rational link” between policy and an attempt to forward the greater good all charter rights are subject to infringement at any petty wimp. In this complete destruction of any standard to not violate rights Judge Joyal completely side steps to fully embrace her public health fascists.
“In the present case, I have no difficulty in concluding, based on logic, reason and a common sensical understanding of the evidence (see amongst others, the evidence of Dr. Brent Roussin, Dr. Jason Kindrachuk, Dr. Carla Loeppky) that the measures taken to limit gatherings, including in places of worship, are rationally connected to the goal of reducing the spread of COVID‑19. As the evidence has demonstrated, the virus is spread through respiratory droplets. It is reasonable and logical to conclude as has been suggested, that the risk of transmission is particularly high in gatherings involving close contact for prolonged periods. It is not surprising that outbreaks of COVID‑19 have occurred in various gatherings, including in places of worship.”
This joke of a judge has narrowed down the demonstrably justified to “is policy linked to ATTEMPTING to stop a harm.” The reader may be forgiven for assuming that judges were intelligent and able to reason themselves out of a sweater. Why not enforce breathing limits so you must breathe every 20 seconds judge? It will stop the spread of a respiratory virus (we think!). Just make it so everyone breathes every 20 seconds, it is less infringing than a total breathing ban! I apologize if I have given this judge any innovative ideas to enact during the next “pandemic”.
Nor does the judge appear to have the mental faculties to address the balance of risks in gathering places. Did more outbreaks occurred at places of worship rather than political meetings or Costco/grocery stores. Who knows? This disgraced judge Joyal does not care. Giving no frame of reference “that outbreaks of COVID‑19 have occurred in various gatherings, including in places of worship” this ‘pointed statement’ becomes little more then a self report as the judge was unable to show a heightened risk as proclaimed by medical officials.
The judge went on to say that the rules were great because no alternatives were offered: “The minimal impairment requirement in a s. 1 analysis requires that the impugned PHOs limit rights in a manner that is reasonably tailored to the objective. If there are alternative, less harmful means of achieving the government’s objective “in a real and substantial manner” as compared with the measure or means under challenge, then the law in question will fail the minimal impairment test (see R. v. K.R.J., at paragraph 70)”
Ignoring her earlier statements on The Great Barrington Declaration she suggests that:
“While I accept that the theory of focused protection emanating from the Great Barrington Declaration is part of what must be the rigorous ongoing and evolving “scientific conversation”, it is not an approach that has been adopted or followed by most governments or their public health officials in Canada or elsewhere in the world.”
To Judge Joyal if the rest of the world is not doing it then you cannot do it when it comes to LESS restrictive policies (ignoring Sweden). This sets up a perverse incentive where the judge green lights the harshest and stupidest covid policies. The Oakes test becomes a defense FOR over-reach as nobody comes to the courts and says: “my government is not doing enough for covid!” Prior to the lockdowns or “essential vs non-essential” the fact nobody enacted these policies was irrelevant to their implementation. Further the judge added:
“By December 10, 2020, after the Level Red restrictions were imposed, Manitoba peaked at 129 patients in ICU. Dr. Roussin concluded, based on all the data that was before him, that a temporary circuit break was essential to significantly reduce the number of contacts and regain control of the pandemic. Based on the evidence presented, Manitoba argues, and I agree, that Dr. Roussin had a strong basis for determining that in his professional judgment, any lesser restriction would not have sufficed. “
Judge Joyal defense of the covid policies was a list of ‘aren’t you glad your government did not impose curfews, or still allowed weddings, funerals, and baptisms—for 5 people only’. Like those other places! Rather than truth or effective policies, be happy you are not living in North Korea! Hysterical Judge Joyal and Dr. Roussin the quack were forced to admit that “By the fall of 2020, it became clear that the previous measures in place up until then proved insufficient to stop the exponential spread of the virus.”
So, everything to this point did not work. No need for reflection. No need for justification of policies. Just more policies! Judge Joyal and Dr. Roussin used this to justify the “circuit breaker”, 13-weeks to stopping covid, in which limitations were completely removed. All rights were revoked. Always failing to recognize that none of their policies worked. The “13-week period” was not set at the start as a “13-week period” rather it was 2 weeks becomes 13 weeks policy. There is no evidence that any of these policies worked as covid naturally wanes (similar to seasonal diseases like influenza) in spring.
One has to wonder if the disgraced Chief Judge Joyal stands by this remark: “In considering and assessing the applicants’ arguments at this third and final stage of the proportionality inquiry, it seems unavoidable but to conclude that much of what the applicants assert respecting the disproportionally negative impact of the limitations, is inextricably tied to their (the applicants) contention that the scientific evidence provides an insufficient justification for the unprecedented action taken by Manitoba. In other words, according to the applicants, the limitations and restrictions on rights based on unconvincing science, do more harm than good given what the applicants say is Manitoba’s misplaced and to some extent, unnecessary response.”
Covid judgements will one day be looked back upon in the same light as American Cases that upheld slavery (Dred Scott v. Sandford) or the upholding of eugenics and sterilizing of the “unfit” in Buck v. Bell. Canadians must read, shame, and remove these corrupt judges that believe rights can be easily infringed with no consequences for the greater good. It is not that far of a leap from this disgusting ruling to that of eugenics or slavery when you begin to deny the moral sanctity of individuals. Lowering the threshold (scrutiny) of section 1 is to reverse the onus of the entire charter.
Rather than protecting citizens from the stupid and overbearing government, the charter becomes nothing more then a welcome mat to right infringements and a defensive position to hide behind for corrupt judges and courts. Canadians blissfully unaware believe that there is a high standard, and courts and lawyers are often all to happy to continue this delusion. In effect only persons that are favoured or are in high progressive castes get and receive the protections afforded by the Charter. The general populace is left vassals of the petty whims of busybody tyrants. The greater good is oft the refrain of murders selling genocide and oppression.
Quebec
Quebec is unique in Canada. Not as infected with the woke mind virus most Quebecors can say what they think with little recourse. At least the Canadians of Quebec view themselves as distinct and refuse to submit their people to the moral judgment of the English speaking world. If a politician wishes to say something controversial they will say it en francias to narrow the scope of people that will receive the message. However, like every politician in Canada that had some power, the name of the game was to be seen doing something. ANYTHING. People “having fun” during a pandemic was outlawed.
The pandemic is a solemn time! Having fun or anything “normal” is illegal! Gatherings of more then 5 or those that were “outside of a bubble” were not allowed and you are a bad person for trying to see those people. A “bubble” being a social group of close family or friends that Canadians were to restrict their interactions to (between 6-10). Experts explained these rules were based on research… (bullshit they just made up as they went along). Experts claimed that capping social interactions to 10 would help prevent transmission. Within a bubble you no longer needed to social distance!
Other than sounding like something dreamed up by a midwit, the ever changing laws made “the bubble” all but irrelevant. Perhaps those that tuned into the covid daily hysteria were able to follow the ever changing bubble nonsense. Contributing to the anger, confusion, isolation and alienation of individuals. Canadians were propagandized to fear their neighbours. Some Canadians were pushed by this fear and hysteria (or a perverse sense of duty) to report their neighbours.
A New Years Eve party was shut down by Gatineau police at the end of 2020. Video of police attacking and violently ending this party went viral with police wrestling, choking out Quebecours at an open door.1 In the shocking and disturbing footage, one man, who is having trouble breathing, is grabbed by the throat by a police officer and thrown out onto the snowy ground. Out on the snow the police jump on him and choke him into handcuffs and submission. The argument of rights continues at the door while the police attempt to block a video recording of the violent arrest by shutting the door on other occupants. Thanks to a vile traitorous neighbour this New Years Eve party of six people was VIOLENTLY broken up. A neighbour broke up a party of six people. All six were of the same family. Liberté pour tyrannie.
CBC tried to justify these nonsense by shifting the blame to the victims saying that the “party goers” were taking risks! By this logic, it is a wonder that CBC reporters make it out of bed in the morning.2 Police officers did not have their magical masks on! This was casually excused with the “urgency of the situation.” Covid not only respects funerals, it also respects urgent situations! Police just followed orders regardless of the actual risk presented.
Quebec Public Health Fascists continued the crack down on families/parties on Feb 11, 2021, issuing $7500 fines for 5 people in “private gathering in Val-des-Monts, Que.”3 Violating Curfew! Being in a room with 5 people! Outaouais police and judges did such hard detective work! If a justice system that acts like a gang, and spends its time harassing people while letting murderers, car thieves and rapists go free. Fired without pension. This would be a lenient punishment of these “Let them Eat Cake” type politicians/police/judges. In Cantley, Quebec on March 13, 2021, $1550 fines to the “7 people gathered at residence” that rented an Airbnb.4 Or the $18,000 in fines for a party in Val-des-Monts Quebec on March 26, 2021. Police and the fearless propagandists at the CBC started getting annoyed at the flaunting of covid rules! How dare people not follow the rules! Covid is so scary you must stay home!
Next: Chapter 13: Residential Schools and Desecration of Churches
Chapter 12: No Man Can Serve Two Masters
Alberta
1. Government of Alberta (n.d). Respiratory virus dashboard. Alberta Public Health. Retrieved from https://www.alberta.ca/stats/covid-19-alberta-statistics.htm#severe-outcomes
2. Bexte K. (2020, Apr 18). Fight the Fines case #1 — “Social distancing” police fined a man $1,200 for feeding homeless people. Rebel News. Retrieved from https://www.rebelnews.com/fight_the_fines_1_fined_for_feeding_the_homeless_in_calgary
3. Prestigiacomo A. (2021, Apr 5). ‘Out, You Nazis!’: Viral Video Shows Pastor Kicking Out Officers From Church Easter Weekend. Dailywire. Retrieved from https://www.dailywire.com/news/out-you-nazis-viral-video-shows-pastor-kicking-out-officers-from-church-easter-weekend
4. Faithwire. (2021, Apr 3). Polish Pastor Chases Cops Out of Church on Easter Weekend: ‘Get Out! You Nazis!’. Faithwire. Youtube. Retrieved from
5. Soos A. (2021, Apr 28). Calgary police obtain SECRET warrant to use “any force necessary” to disrupt church service. Rebel News. Retrieved from https://www.rebelnews.com/calgary_police_obtain_secret_warrant_to_use_any_force_necessary_to_disrupt_church_service
6. Rebel News. (2021, May 8). POLICE STATE: Watch the moment a SWAT team arrests a Canadian pastor. Retrieved from https://www.rebelnews.com/police_state_watch_the_moment_a_swat_team_arrests_canadian_pastor_artur_pawlowski
7. Levant E. (2021, May 10). Pastor Artur Pawlowski is FREE — but why did the guards refuse for hours to let him out?. Rebel News. Retrieved from https://www.rebelnews.com/pastor_artur_is_free_but_why_did_guards_delay
8. Soos A. (2021, May 17). SHAMEFUL: Arsonists attack Pastor Artur's home in Calgary. Rebel News. Retrieved from https://www.rebelnews.com/arsonists_attack_pastor_arturs_home_in_calgary
9. Rebel News. (2021, May 5). BREAKING: Police, Alberta Health Services raid Whistle Stop Cafe in early morning bust. Retrieved from https://www.rebelnews.com/police_alberta_health_services_raid_whistlestop_diner_in_early_morning_bust
10. Reid S. G. (2021, May 6). Whistle Stop Cafe sets up “freedom park,” plans for “biggest protest Alberta's ever seen”. Rebel News. Retrieved from https://www.rebelnews.com/whistle_stop_cafe_sets_up_freedom_park_plans_for_biggest_protest_albertas_ever_seen
11. The Canadian Press. (2021, May 9). Police arrest cafe owner, hand out tickets to dozens leaving Alberta anti-lockdown protest. Edmonton Journal. Retrieved from https://edmontonjournal.com/news/crime/dozens-gather-at-whistle-stoo-cafe-to-rally-against-alberta-public-health-orders
12. Connolly A. (2021, May 9). Calgary mayor says anti-mask rallies are ‘thinly veiled white nationalist’ protests. Global News. Retrieved from https://globalnews.ca/news/7843813/naheed-nenshi-covid-pandemic-vaccinations/
13.
https://twitter.com/punditclass/status/1391202519406170116
(This Post from @punditclass has been withheld in all countries in response to a legal demand)
14. Gunter L. (2021, May 11). GUNTER: Calgary Mayor Naheed Nenshi's remarks comparing anti-maskers to white supremacists are disgusting and ignorant. Edmonton Sun. Retrieved from https://edmontonsun.com/opinion/columnists/gunter-calgary-mayor-naheed-nenshis-remarks-comparing-anti-maskers-to-white-supremacists-are-disgusting-and-ignorant
15. Rebel News. (2021, May 16). BREAKING: Calgary police arrest Fairview Baptist Church pastor Tim Stephens. Retrieved from https://www.rebelnews.com/calgary_police_arrest_fairview_baptist_church_pastor_tim_stephens
16. Reid S. G. (2021, May 16). UPDATE: Lawyer says Pastor Tim Stephens unlawfully arrested under amended AHS order. Rebel News. Retrieved from https://www.rebelnews.com/lawyer_says_pastor_tim_stephens_unlawfully_arrested_under_amended_ahs_order
17. JCCF. (2021, May 14). Justice Centre obtains change to expansive Court ban on all peaceful outdoor gatherings in Alberta. Retrieved from https://www.jccf.ca/justice-centre-obtains-change-to-expansive-court-ban-on-all-peaceful-outdoor-gatherings-in-alberta/
18. Rebel News. (2021, May 28). BREAKING: Contempt of court proceedings DROPPED against Pastor Tim Stephens. Retrieved from https://www.rebelnews.com/contempt_of_court_proceedings_dropped_against_pastor_tim_stephens
19. CBC News. (2021 May 28). Calgary pastor sees charge dropped over 'mistaken identity' issue when papers were served. Retrieved from https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/tim-stephens-fairview-baptist-church-contempt-dropped-mistaken-identity-1.6045417
20. Soos A. (2021, May 28). Case dropped against Pastor Tim Stephens of Fairview Baptist Church. Rebel News. Retrieved from https://www.rebelnews.com/case_dropped_against_pastor_tim_stephens_of_fairview_baptist_church
21. JCCF. (2021, May 28). AHS drops contempt of court proceedings against Pastor Tim Stephens. Retrieved from https://www.jccf.ca/ahs-drops-contempt-of-court-proceedings-against-pastor-tim-stephens
22. Soos A.(2021, May 31). Celebrations short-lived as Calgary police pay ANOTHER visit to Fairview Baptist Church. Rebel News. Retrieved from https://www.rebelnews.com/short-lived_celebration_as_calgary_police_pay_another_visit_to_fairview_baptist_church
23. Soos A. (2021, June 15). Pastor Tim Stephens arrested on new charges after 'underground' church services. Rebel News. Retrieved from https://www.rebelnews.com/breaking_pastor_tim_stephens_arrested_on_new_charges
24. Bible. Retrieved from https://biblehub.com/mark/12-17.htm
25. Soos A. (2021, June 15). Pastor Tim Stephens arrested on new charges after 'underground' church services. Rebel News. Retrieved from https://www.rebelnews.com/breaking_pastor_tim_stephens_arrested_on_new_charges
26. Soos A. (2021, June 26). Twitter.
https://twitter.com/ATSoos/status/1408878502254759939
27. JCCF. (2021, May 14). Justice Centre obtains change to expansive Court ban on all peaceful outdoor gatherings in Alberta. Retrieved from https://www.jccf.ca/justice-centre-obtains-change-to-expansive-court-ban-on-all-peaceful-outdoor-gatherings-in-alberta/
28. Makin K. (2012, Sept 28). Alberta judge fights to take back legal system. The Globe and Mail. Retrieved from https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/alberta-judge-fights-to-take-back-legal-system/article4576517/
29. Justice Rooke. (2021, May 6). Rooke Order. Retrieved from https://www.jccf.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/2021-05-06-Order-Rooke-filed.pdf
30. Justice Germain A. W. (2021, June 29). Alberta Health Services v Pawlowski, 2021 ABQB 493. Retrieved from https://www.canlii.org/en/ab/abqb/doc/2021/2021abqb493/2021abqb493.html?resultIndex=8
31. Justice Strekaf J. (2021, Dec 1). Alberta Health Services v Pawlowski, 2021 ABCA 392. Retrieved from https://www.canlii.org/en/ab/abca/doc/2021/2021abca392/2021abca392.html?searchUrlHash=AAAAAQAJcGF3bG93c2tpAAAAAAE&resultIndex=5
32. Kumar A. (2021, Jul 4). Canadian Pastor Tim Stephens released from jail: 'I'm thankful for God'. Christian Post. Retrieved from https://www.christianpost.com/news/canadian-pastor-tim-stephens-released-from-jail-glorifies-god.html
33. Soos A. (2021, Jul 1). BREAKING: Pastor Tim Stephens FREED from jail! Rebel News. Retrieved from https://www.rebelnews.com/pastor_tim_stephens_freed_from_jail
34. Justice Fradsham A. A. (2022, Nov 11). R v Stephens, 2022 ABPC 220. Retrieved from https://www.canlii.org/en/ab/abpc/doc/2022/2022abpc220/2022abpc220.html?resultIndex=1&resultId=9a88da6fa8654979866223696c0a6d23&searchId=a5dd04938b0e48959224237e33df6ac1&searchUrlHash=AAAAAQAhQWxiZXJ0YSBIZWFsdGggU2VydmljZXMsIFN0ZXBoZW5zAAAAAAE
35. Global News. (2023, Aug 31). COVID-19 pandemic charges dropped against Pastor Tim Stephens and others. Retrieved from https://globalnews.ca/video/9933540/covid-19-pandemic-charges-dropped-against-pastor-tim-stephens-and-others
Ontario
1. Davidson S. (2020, Oct 19). Ford slams protesters throwing fake blood, intimidating children near his house. CTV News. Retrieved from https://toronto.ctvnews.ca/ford-slams-protesters-throwing-fake-blood-intimidating-children-near-his-house-1.5151371
2. Menzies D. (2021, Jan 27). Toronto police takeover Yonge-Dundas Square, arrest protesters, try to shut down media coverage. Rebel News. Retrieved from https://www.rebelnews.com/toronto_police_takeover_yonge_dundas_square_arrest_protesters_try_to_shut_down_media_coverage
3. Ramlochan K. (2021, Jan 16). 3 people arrested and charged after anti-lockdown protests in Toronto. Global News. Retrieved from https://globalnews.ca/news/7581396/3-pzople-arrested-and-charged-after-a-anti-lockdown-protest-in-toronto/
4. Miller M. (2021, March 29). Thousands gather at Nathan Phillips Square to protest anti-Asian racism in Toronto. BlogTO. Retrieved from https://www.blogto.com/city/2021/03/thousands-gather-nathan-phillips-square-protest-anti-asian-racism-toronto/
5. Menzies D. (2021, Jan 27). Toronto police takeover Yonge-Dundas Square, arrest protesters, try to shut down media coverage. Rebel News. Retrieved from https://www.rebelnews.com/toronto_police_takeover_yonge_dundas_square_arrest_protesters_try_to_shut_down_media_coverage
6. Rebel News. (2021, Feb 9). Ezra Levant lays out lawsuit against Toronto Police Service. Rebel News. Retrieved from https://www.rebelnews.com/ezra_levant_lays_out_lawsuit_against_toronto_police_service
7. Menzies D. (2021, Apr 27). Bernier, Hillier ticketed during tense rally in Peterborough, Ontario. Rebel News. Retrieved from https://www.rebelnews.com/bernier_hillier_ticketed_during_tense_rally_in_peterborough_ontario
8. Monsanto E. (2021, May 13). Rebel reporter FINED for reporting on Hamilton Freedom Rally. Rebel News. Retrieved from https://www.rebelnews.com/rebel_reporter_fined_for_reporting_on_hamilton_freedom_rally
9. Rebel News. (2021, May 15). Police in Ontario seize Aylmer Church of God, pastor fined for holding services. Retrieved from https://www.rebelnews.com/police_in_ontario_seize_aylmer_church_of_god_pastor_fined_for_holding_services
10. Alberga H. (2021, Jun 8). 'A province left in mourning': Premier Doug Ford attends vigil for Muslim family struck in deadly targeted attack. CTV News. Retrieved from https://toronto.ctvnews.ca/a-province-left-in-mourning-premier-doug-ford-attends-vigil-for-muslim-family-struck-in-deadly-targeted-attack-1.5461216
11. Reuters. (2021, June 12). Muslim victims of truck attack given farewell with coffins draped in Canadian flags. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/hundreds-take-part-funeral-canadian-muslim-family-killed-truck-attack-2021-06-12/
12. Pastor Hildebrandt H. (2021, Jun 18). Twitter. Retrieved from
https://twitter.com/aylmerpastor/status/1405898730784559107
13. Howlett K. (2021, May 9). Patients died from neglect, not COVID-19, in Ontario LTC homes, military report finds: ‘All they needed was water and a wipe down’. The Globe and Mail. Retrieved from https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-canadian-military-report-documents-deplorable-conditions-at-two/
14. Howlett K., Mahoney J., Stone L. (2020, May 26). Infestations, sedation and neglect: Military report details ‘horrific’ living conditions in seniors’ homes. The Globe and Mail. Retrieved from https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-infestations-sedation-and-neglect-military-report-details-horrific/
15. Butler C. (2021, May 4). Group of Ontario police officers launches charter challenge of pandemic restrictions. CBC News. Retrieved from https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/london/police-oath-pandemic-legal-challenge-1.6012099
16. Pastor Hildebrandt H. (2024, Feb 4). Twitter. Retrieved from
https://twitter.com/aylmerpastor/status/1754345728510402774
17. jj980 980 CFPL. (2021, May 18). Large Church of God gathering leads to more charges: Aylmer Police. Global News. Retrieved from https://globalnews.ca/news/7871713/church-of-god-aylmer-police/
Nova Scotia No! Hamas Vs Israel? YES!
1. Long S. (2021, May 14). N.S. government granted injunction to stop anti-mask, anti-lockdown protests. CTV News. Retrieved from https://atlantic.ctvnews.ca/n-s-government-granted-injunction-to-stop-anti-mask-anti-lockdown-protests-1.5428287
2. Tutton M. (2021, May 17). Halifax police defend ticketing of protesters in weekend Palestine solidarity event. The Chronicle Journal. Retrieved from https://www.chroniclejournal.com/atlantic/halifax-police-defend-ticketing-of-protesters-in-weekend-palestine-solidarity-event/article_e2ffdf65-4e30-5e3c-a896-a4d12c9dd7c7.html
3. Mocha B. (2021, May 15). Twitter. Retrieved from
https://twitter.com/BezirganMocha/status/1393675902542917632
5. Levy S-A. (2021, May 19). LEVY: Israeli man brutally beaten for defending friend at rally. Toronto Sun. Retrieved from https://torontosun.com/news/local-news/levy-israeli-man-brutally-beaten-for-defending-friend-at-rally
6. Bezirgan A. (2021, May 19). Pro-Israel protester punches Rebel journalist during duelling Montreal rallies. Rebel News. Retrieved from https://www.rebelnews.com/pro-israel_protester_punches_rebel_journalist_during_duelling_montreal_rallies
7. Trudeau J. (2021, May 16). Twitter. Retrieved from
https://twitter.com/JustinTrudeau/status/1394099973709565954
8. Turnbull S. (2021, May 4). Lockdown protesters are undermining their own objective: PM Trudeau. CTV News. Retrieved from https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/lockdown-protesters-are-undermining-their-own-objective-pm-trudeau-1.5413548
Manitoba
1. MacLean C. (2020, Nov 19). Manitoba bans in-store sales of non-essential items, visitors to homes with some exceptions. CBC News. Retrieved from https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/manitoba-bans-visitors-sale-nonessential-items-1.5808235
2. Manitoba Health (n.d.) Covid-19 Novel Coronavirus. Retrieved from https://www.gov.mb.ca/covid19/updates/cases.html#maps
3. Steinbuch Y. (2020, Oct 26). Store apologizes for not allowing woman to buy 'non-essential' sanitary products. Ny Post. Retrieved from https://nypost.com/2020/10/26/store-apologizes-after-woman-calls-sanitary-products-non-essential/
4. Tiefer C. (2020, Dec 11). In A Strategically Key Legal Move, A Federal Court In Pennsylvania Upheld A Challenged Mask Mandate. Forbes. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/charlestiefer/2020/12/11/in-a-strategically-key-legal-move-a-federal-court-in-pennsylvania-upheld-a-challenged-mask-mandate/
5. Bexte K. (2020, Nov 29). Pastor CHARGED for organizing a PROTEST in Manitoba. Rebel News. Retrieved from https://www.rebelnews.com/charged_for_organizing_a_protest_in_manitoba
6. Fizzard S. (2021, June 4). Defiant pastor on the run from police in Manitoba, will only be arrested at church. Rebel News. Retrieved from https://www.rebelnews.com/defiant_pastor_on_the_run_from_police_in_manitoba
7. CBC News. (2020, Nov 29). Fine issued as police block Steinbach-area churchgoers from outlawed drive-in service. Retrieved from https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/church-of-god-hanover-manitoba-covid-19-restrictions-1.5821296
8. Rebel News. (2021, June 12). Update: Police continue to hunt down Pastor while threatening his church with potential million dollar fine. Retrieved from https://www.rebelnews.com/update_police_continue_to_hunt_down_pastor_while_threatening_his_church_with_a_potential_1_million_fine
9. Bexte K. (2020, Dec 7). Church CHARGED $6,000 for DRIVE-IN services; bylaw wait until Media Party leaves to issue tickets. Rebel News. Retrieved from https://www.rebelnews.com/church_charged_6000_for_drive_in_services_bylaw_wait_until_media_party_leaves_to_issue_tickets
10. (2021, Oct 21). Gateway Bible Baptist Church et al. v. Manitoba et al. Retrieved from https://www.canlii.org/en/mb/mbqb/doc/2021/2021mbqb219/2021mbqb219.html?resultIndex=2&resultId=78dd08bf21114381b1568a44bc77a611&searchId=5dc8ac09b9d14a3f84e8a959550f5a70&searchUrlHash=AAAAAQATIEdsZW5uIEpveWFsIHRvYmlhcwAAAAAB
11. (1993, Mar 12). The Constitution Act, 1982, Schedule B to the Canada Act 1982 (UK), 1982, c 11. Retrieved from https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/laws/stat/schedule-b-to-the-canada-act-1982-uk-1982-c-11/latest/schedule-b-to-the-canada-act-1982-uk-1982-c-11.html
12. Velavan TP, Pallerla SR, Kremsner PG. How to (ab)use a COVID-19 antigen rapid test with soft drinks? Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Oct;111:28-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.08.023. Epub 2021 Aug 18. PMID: 34418566; PMCID: PMC8372450. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8372450/
13. JudyyduJJudyP (@Youarenuttz). (2024, Jan 8). Twitter. Retrieved from
https://twitter.com/Youarenuttz/status/1744579193370026029
14. Manitoba Health. (n.d.). Provincial Respiratory Surveillance Report COVID-19. Government of Manitoba. Retrieved from https://www.gov.mb.ca/health/publichealth/surveillance/covid-19/index.html
Quebec
1. Levant E. (2021, Jan 5). Quebec police drag man from his home for COVID violation — where are the opposition politicians? Rebel News. Youtube. Retrieved from
2. Kester S. (2021, Jan 2). Gatineau, Que., police issue fines over New Year's Eve party that ended in heated altercation. CBC News. Retrieved from https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/gatineau-police-new-years-altercation-1.5859782
3. CBC News. (2021, Feb 12). Police to issue $7,500 in fines to 5 people for private gathering in Val-des-Monts, Que. Retrieved from https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/mrc-collines-curfew-gathering-1.5913316
4. CBC News. (2021, May 13). Partygoers in Cantley, Que., face steep fines following police visit. Retrieved from https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/cantley-partygoers-fines-covid-19-1.5948853
5. Raymond T. (2021, March 29). Police break up another party in the Outaouais, hand out $18,000 in fines. CTV News. Retrieved from https://ottawa.ctvnews.ca/police-break-up-another-party-in-the-outaouais-hand-out-18-000-in-fines-1.5366952